But what happens if the system itself does not allow you to fully integrate
and function within it?
“I would say it’s the constant discouragement, both from the art scene
and the political state. I’ve understood that financially profiting from art
is not achievable for me. It has come to a point where being a trans person, especially in public media, is treated as criminal. Many openly LGBTQ+ artists and social media figures in Turkey have been arrested or imprisoned. In Istanbul, queer nightlife is almost completely banned. That raises the question:
why am I still doing this?
The only answer I have is that art is my way of being. I believe that as long
as humanity exists, art, entertainment and nightlife will exist. Maybe I would share more social media content if I wasn’t afraid of backlash from conservative people in my country. But other than that, I have never censored myself
or my art at all. What enables me to still work here? I’m unable to move somewhere else, and creating art is necessary for my existence.”
At some point, the conversation naturally turns back to the body. Asked
about embodiment and vulnerability, Syntia answers in just three words:
“I am a trans woman.”
The response is almost telegraphic, without explanation or rhetoric. Yet behind this brevity lies a radical shift in the way one exists in the world. Later she adds:
“To transition was really eye-opening for me. Being seen as a boy was so much easier. I was able to be shy. But as a woman, I had to learn to stand up
for myself. It feels dangerous to be visibly queer in Istanbul, especially when you’re alone.”
The transition here is not a change of image but a change in the regime
of visibility. If in “Bedel” being oneself means being connected to a system,
in reality it means being recognized and therefore vulnerable.